The Prediction of Success in Project Management – Predictive Project Analytics at Deloitte

04.04.2016 | verfasst von Autorengruppe| Deloitte

Over 60 percent of projects experience failure, resulting in higher costs, time overruns, or shortcomings in the desired outputs. Effectively no tools exist that allows forecasting which projects will fail and what can to be done to counteract risks. Predictive Project Analytics addresses these issues and allows organizations to better understand project complexity against maturity of existing governance models and control mechanisms in order to identify and avoid sources of failure.

Article by:

Jochen Fauser, Partner Technology

Markus Schmidthuysen, Manager Technology Advisory

Benjamin Scheffold, Consultant Technology


In the changing global economic landscape it is vital for organizations to stay competitive and reduce costs. Replacing outdated technology, improving business processes and implementing new programs are examples of activities that organizations undertake to face these demands. The increased pressure to deliver capital, business and technology projects within budget, specifications and schedule makes it necessary to avoid or at least soften risks and challenges that could compromise the desired outcomes of projects. Capabilities to manage project risk and guarantee effective governance, supported with insights from powerful analytical techniques, are needed to enable project and business transformation success.
This article summarizes typical challenges which business and technology projects currently face, and how Deloitte’s Predictive Project Analytic approach can help to address these. The different phases of the approach are introduced briefly and benefits are illustrated with a real client example.


1. Introduction
Success and growth in business is often tied to an organization’s ability to effectively manage major capital investment projects, streamlining business processes and the implementation of new technologies. Project management has gained importance in order to address the ongoing concern of value creation for organizations. Complex social, economic, and business issues have raised project management to a new level of strategic importance and delivered a new set of challenges that organizations need to face. Yet, despite the inherent strategic importance of projects, cost overruns, outcomes that don’t meet agreed requirements, or even entire project failures are experienced frequently.
The yearly CHAOS research of the The Standish Group, covering 50.000 company projects, illustrates that over 60 percent of organizations experienced failure. Drilling down into more detail reveals that time overruns are the primary issue that 74 percent of the challenged projects face, followed by shortcomings in developed features (69 percent) and higher costs than planned with 59 percent. Bloch, Blumberg, and Laartz (2011) confirm these as the key challenges organizations experience and add that in some cases project failed so badly that they threatened the existence of the company.
There are diverse reasons for project failure, ranging from the constant pressure of in-house teams to deliver in less time and at lower cost, poorly defined requirements, and lack of access to specialist resources. Due to the potentially repercussions of failure, organizations have always searched for ways to keep projects on track and improve their performance. As an example, academic research provides insights on factors affecting success and failure, but cannot provide methods or tools to predict the outcome of particular projects or individual phases. Traditional risk assessment, on the other hand, is based on expert knowledge but lacks the ability to pinpoint specific control gaps that can cause a project to go off the rails. And virtually no tools exist that allows the prediction of which projects will fail and what needs to be done to get them back on track.

Even in large and complex projects, risk management does not receive sufficient focus as part of project management, until the risks materialize as issues. Potential risks identified by risk analysis in early stages are typically filed away and not actively checked and monitored. In later phases of the project, when potential risks emerge, mitigation and remediation strategies are used to counter these risks, but their impact on the project as a whole is often not comprehensively considered. Risk management can further be hampered in global and large-scale projects as the high number of resources, activities, stakeholders, and deliverables involved, adding even more complexity to the situation. In combination with conflicting objectives and priorities among stakeholders, scenarios can be created that lead to projects with high expectations but little success. Such projects often come with an increased likelihood of cost and schedule overruns.
There is a demand for new approaches to assess the health and reliability of projects and transformation initiatives, better equipping project management to deal with large and complex projects. Predictive Project Analytics (PPA) is a project risk assessment methodology that originates from data analysis and predictive analysis. It allows the forecasting of potential risks at project kickoff, and identification of pre-emptive risk mitigation actions for ongoing programs.



Veröffentlicht mit freundlicher Genehmigung der GPM Deutsche Gesellschaft für Projektmanagement e.V. Erstabdruck in Projektmanagement aktuell, Jahrgang 2015, Heft 5, S. 66 – 74.

read more
facebook twitter linkedin xing
Die neuesten Artikel im BDU-Fachartikelbereich

Sichtbarkeit ist für Unternehmen erfolgsentscheidend

Bert Klingsporn, Experte für den digitalen Wandel in Marketing und Vertrieb, erläutert im Gespräch mit Andrea Przyklenk, weshalb Sichtbarkeit für jedes Unternehmen zu einem entscheidenden Erfolgskriterium wird.

[13.09.2019 | verfasst von Bert Klingsporn | Certified Management Consultant (CMC/BDU) | Digital Strategy & Transformation]

Die Familienstiftung als langfristige Chance für die Unternehmensnachfolge

In vielen Unternehmerfamilien besteht der Hauptanteil des Vermögens aus dem eigentlichen Unternehmen. Daher besteht sehr häufig der Wunsch, das Unternehmen langfristig in der Familie zu halten, auch dann, wenn es keinen geeigneten familieninternen Nachfolger gibt.

[20.08.2019 | verfasst von Klaus-Christian Knuffmann | Partner | K.E.R.N - Die Nachfolgespezialisten]

Erneuerung durch Company Rebuilding?

Was ist los in den Top-Etagen deutscher Konzerne? Die Vorstände reisen durch die Technologie-Mekkas dieser Welt, gründen Ideen-Labore, ziehen ihre Krawatten aus, geben ihre Einzelbüros auf, lassen Hollywoodschaukeln in ihre Open-Space-Büros hängen, und verzweifeln immer wieder daran, dass selbst kleinste Innovationsversuche in den Weiten ihrer starren Organisation stecken bleiben. Denn sie wissen es doch ganz genau: Geschäftsmodelle, die über Jahrzehnte nahezu unantastbar schienen und hohe Margen abwarfen, werden durch neue, häufig kleine und junge Unternehmen auf den Kopf gestellt. Insbesondere technologische Markteintrittsbarrieren verschwinden nahezu vollständig. Technologie ist frei verfügbar und wartet darauf, für die Disruption des nächsten Marktes genutzt zu werden. Alles nicht neu. Dennoch sehen deutsche Unternehmenslenker weiterhin mit weit aufgerissenen Augen zu, wie täglich neue Startup-Piranhas das eigene Dinosaurier-Unternehmen attackieren. Warum schaffen es die Großen trotzdem nicht, auf all das sinnvoll zu reagieren und sich zu erneuern?

[20.08.2019 | verfasst von Marc Wagner | Managing Partner, Member of the International Management Board | Detecon Consulting]
Sie sind Mitglied und möchten auch einen Artikel einstellen?
Ich möchte einen eingestellten Artikel löschen.